From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2319 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2009 16:09:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 2312 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Nov 2009 16:09:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:09:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA6G9LDs030903; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:09:21 -0500 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-227-44.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.227.44]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA6G9LlU020920; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:09:21 -0500 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id C0A2C580AC; Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:09:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:09:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: overseers@sourceware.org, Eric Brown , Jonathan Pickard , ian@airs.com, Matthew Galgoci Subject: Re: Required host migration (Sourceware) Message-ID: <20091106160920.GB7039@redhat.com> References: <4AC25F6E.6050208@redhat.com> <20091001180237.GD20893@redhat.com> <4AC4F8D6.7070200@redhat.com> <20091001191144.GA22850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20091001192043.GA32049@redhat.com> <4AF3539A.3010501@redhat.com> <20091105225721.GA2699@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091105225721.GA2699@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2 Hi - On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:57:21PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > [...] > >[...] > >1) move to PHX2 (migrate) > >2) order new hardware for PHX2 (phased migration) > > > >For 1) - Red Hat IT will move the machines and bring them back up in > >PHX2, reconfiguring their network details if wanted and providing remote > >access (serial and/or KVM along with remote power management). > > > >For 2) - Red Hat IT will install any new hardware and provide remote > >access (serial and/or KVM along with remote power management) and you > >will migrate your services from PHX to PHX2. > I would very much prefer 2. I don't think IT was offering to procure a new machine for us, just to install one if we can get hold of same. (And as we discussed before, since our server2/server3 machines were purchased with inadequate resources, they can't bear the load.) So by default, this would mean option #1. (As I offered before, I can arrange to have a RAM upgrade package sent to RH IS to install, along with option #1.) - FChE