From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23156 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2010 17:30:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 22891 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2010 17:29:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-98-110-186-10.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (98.110.186.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:29:46 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE31813C061; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:29:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 9F8482B352; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:29:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:30:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Jeff Law , "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: Email problems Message-ID: <20101026172944.GD14312@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Jeff Law , "Joseph S. Myers" References: <20101026170237.GA14312@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <4CC70C4E.9030609@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CC70C4E.9030609@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:13:50AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/26/10 11:02, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:10:34PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> It appears there are some problems with emails to gcc.gnu.org lists not >>> reaching the lists - for example, I received a personal copy of the >>> attached message but it did not reach the mailing list. Could someone >>> look into what happened with this message? >> This email also took a long time to percolate through the system. I watched >> it come in last night and it took many minutes to propagate. I don't know why. >> >> Are things better now? >The box seems to, in general, be rather slow at the moment. I hopped on >earlier today, it's load was running at about 6 with a variety of cvs >processes running. Perhaps someone is branching a large project still >in the CVS repo or something like that. A load average of 6 isn't bad for the middle of the day on sourceware. However, the load average wasn't that bad last night but it seemed like mail was still arriving rather sluggishly. If my last email is any indication, it seems like there is no obvious bottleneck right now since it came through pretty quickly. cgf