From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14798 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2010 14:21:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 14790 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Nov 2010 14:21:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:21:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAAEL3Om017609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:21:03 -0500 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-229-149.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.229.149]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAAEL2Bs002631; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:21:03 -0500 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 77BD85814D; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:21:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:21:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sourceware on search engines Message-ID: <20101110142102.GF26790@redhat.com> References: <4CDA46DC.50709@jifvik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CDA46DC.50709@jifvik.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 Hi - > I'm sure someone must have provided some rationale at some point which I > missed, but why aren't the sourceware web pages (particularly the mailing > list archives) indexed by search engines? [...] They generally are indexed (not included in robots.txt). Can you give an example of what you see missing? - FChE