From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18571 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2010 17:28:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 18553 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2010 17:28:33 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pool-173-76-56-137.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO cgf.cx) (173.76.56.137) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.83/v0.83-20-g38e4449) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:28:28 +0000 Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F7413C0C9; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:28:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201) id 5FC6E2B352; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:28:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 17:28:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Daniel Kraft Subject: Re: Write access from compile farm Message-ID: <20101204172825.GA24085@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Daniel Kraft References: <4CFA1571.5030300@domob.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CFA1571.5030300@domob.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q4/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2 On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 11:18:25AM +0100, Daniel Kraft wrote: >some time ago I started using the GCC compile farm for development; so >I'm wondering whether it is ok to have SVN write access from the >accounts there -- or this is considered insecure. What are the policies >there? > >As SVN write authentication is done with a public key, I guess that this >means you have to set the access up appropriately up for any machine I >want to use for check-in, right? So... in case the write-access from >compile farm is ok, can I generate a public key there and submit it to >you -- or what should I do? If you have write access already then just use the private key which you already have. cgf