From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-11366-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17922 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2011 01:20:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 17896 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2011 01:20:08 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0
	tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (HELO nm28-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com) (98.139.91.234)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 01:20:01 +0000
Received: from [98.139.91.69] by nm28.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Feb 2011 01:20:00 -0000
Received: from [98.136.185.40] by tm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Feb 2011 01:20:00 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Feb 2011 01:20:00 -0000
Received: from cgf.cx (cgf@173.76.57.204 with login)
        by smtp101.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2011 17:19:59 -0800 PST
X-Yahoo-SMTP: jenXL62swBAWhMTL3wnej93oaS0ClBQOAKs8jbEbx_o-
Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5])
	by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC64D13C0CA;
	Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:19:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (Postfix, from userid 201)
	id AF0282B352; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:19:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 01:20:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
To: fche@redhat.com, overseers@gcc.gnu.org,
	Bernie Innocenti via RT <sysadmin@gnu.org>, ian@airs.com,
	gerald@pfeifer.com
Subject: Re: [gnu.org #670482] SPF record for gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20110215011958.GA19069@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: fche@redhat.com, overseers@gcc.gnu.org,
	Bernie Innocenti via RT <sysadmin@gnu.org>, ian@airs.com,
	gerald@pfeifer.com
References: <RT-Ticket-670482@rt.gnu.org>
 <m339nq36u4.fsf@pepe.airs.com>
 <alpine.LFD.2.02.1102141751450.2792@ybpnyubfg6.ybpnyqbznva6>
 <20110214170132.GA31421@redhat.com>
 <rt-3.4.5-13863-1297709910-1589.670482-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
 <m3tyg61ed6.fsf@pepe.airs.com>
 <rt-3.4.5-13863-1297719825-180.670482-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
 <rt-3.4.5-13863-1297726234-1063.670482-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <rt-3.4.5-13863-1297726234-1063.670482-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sourceware.org>,
	<http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-q1/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 06:30:34PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti via RT wrote:
>But then, why do we give @gcc.gnu.org aliases to all maintainers?  I
>don't use mine these days, but I've always assumed it was ok to use it
>for anything related to GCC development.

We give out accounts so that people can check stuff in and receive
notifications from the system.  It isn't intended to be a free email
forwarding service even though it seems that many people think it
is.

cgf