From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32231 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2012 10:44:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 32169 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2012 10:44:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:43:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2DAhla6020452 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:43:47 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-11-56.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.11.56]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2DAhkZT012013; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:43:47 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 4D0415816B; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:43:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:44:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bugzilla spam Message-ID: <20120313104346.GG17123@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 Hi - On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:47:51AM +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > [...] > Is there a policy for removing spam comments such as this? I think what's missing is mechanism, not policy. AFAIK, bugzilla just doesn't have reasonable spam removal facilities. - FChE