From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29060 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2012 18:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 29041 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Oct 2012 18:14:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ud10.udmedia.de (HELO mail.ud10.udmedia.de) (194.117.254.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:14:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 1467 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2012 20:14:12 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO x4) (ud10?360p3@91.64.96.133) by mail.ud10.udmedia.de with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 13 Oct 2012 20:14:12 +0200 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 18:14:00 -0000 From: Markus Trippelsdorf To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: bugzilla slowness Message-ID: <20121013181412.GA5041@x4> References: <20121013162948.GA246@x4> <20121013174014.GB246@x4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121013174014.GB246@x4> Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On 2012.10.13 at 19:40 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > On 2012.10.13 at 10:01 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > Markus Trippelsdorf writes: > > > > >> This appears to be https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571533 > > >> I'm game to hack on bugzilla's Mailer.pm, as per lpsolit's last > > >> advice. > > > > > > Ping. Can you please implement this? Because the status quo looks > > > awful, see for example: > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.bugs/366661 > > > > I don't understand the reference to that thread. It doesn't seem to say > > anything about slowness committing changes to bugzilla. It seems to me, > > subjectively, that Frank's changes have made it somewhat faster. > > Sorry, this isn't about any slowness, but about the ugly extra empty > lines that inserted when mail from bugzilla is received by Exim. See: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571533 > (and the thread quoted above as an example) Looking deeper, it appears that there are good and bad messages, even when received by Exim. See for example: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.bugs/366320 The first message displays just fine, all other messages in that thread have the extra newlines. The difference is that only the good message has: "Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable" in its header. Only the bad messages all have the following header: "X-Old-Lines: x" (where x changes) -- Markus