From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11519 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2012 19:46:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 11500 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2012 19:46:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_RV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from www2.mrbrklyn.com (HELO www2.mrbrklyn.com) (96.57.23.82) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:46:21 +0000 Received: by www2.mrbrklyn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B6C63A62F; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 14:45:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:53:00 -0000 From: Ruben Safir To: Daniel Berlin Cc: Robert Dewar , Ian Lance Taylor , Diego Novillo , Andrew Pinski , overseers@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Mailing List Subject: Re: Could we start accepting rich-text postings on the gcc lists? Message-ID: <20121124194531.GB19407@www2.mrbrklyn.com> References: <50B10833.50707@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q4/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 > > Yes, we should expect users to change, instead of keeping up with users. No - we shouldn't punish developers by making them use stupid mime translational servces that breaks the replying mechanism in EMACS and mutt because they are stupidly try to post to a tech mailing list on their android as if it is facebook. Blah. Ruben -- http://www.mrbrklyn.com - Interesting Stuff http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software