From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-12829-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28441 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2014 18:45:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sourceware.org>,
	<http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 28366 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2014 18:45:44 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-50.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org
Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org (HELO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) (204.13.248.66)
 by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:45:43 +0000
Received: from pool-173-48-46-28.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([173.48.46.28] helo=cgf.cx)
	by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>)
	id 1XCYse-000GcO-J9; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:45:40 +0000
Received: from ednor (ednor.casa.cgf.cx [192.168.187.5])
	by cgf.cx (Postfix) with SMTP id 749E4600CD;
	Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:45:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ednor (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 14:45:38 -0400
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/foFpS/hpB3757/IQay06l
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:45:00 -0000
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org>
To: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>, overseers@sourceware.org,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: sourceware and git
Message-ID: <20140730184538.GA1043@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>,
	overseers@sourceware.org,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
References: <1942527352.18336706.1406653023761.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1407291812320.19626@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <20140730011311.GB4665@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1407301658350.11696@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1407301658350.11696@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SW-Source: 2014-q3/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:02:47PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>I think having them in one git project (that includes libgloss and the 
>relevant toplevel) would be fine.  I'm generally dubious of things such as 
>submodules;

Your dubiousity doesn't have any bearing if it isn't backed up by facts.
If submodules can't be made to work transparently then that is an
argument for why they might not be used.  A fear of submodules doesn't
translate into rejecting the concept.