From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5624 invoked by alias); 2 Sep 2014 15:35:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5345 invoked by uid 89); 2 Sep 2014 15:35:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Received: from aquarius.hirmke.de (HELO calimero.vinschen.de) (217.91.18.234) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:34:59 +0000 Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5ACED8E1402; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 17:34:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 15:35:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Cygwin lists spam filters Message-ID: <20140902153457.GA12440@calimero.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org References: <20140902091708.GQ2644@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140902144959.GA4439@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140902144959.GA4439@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SW-Source: 2014-q3/txt/msg00127.txt.bz2 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 765 On Sep 2 10:49, Christopher Faylor wrote: > As previously explained, the block was for email addresses which might > be mailing list addresses. For instance, this was not blocked: >=20 > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-08/msg00598.html I have two guys of which I got copies of their emails in private mail which were bounced with the "spam threshold exceeded" message. Content-wise, they were entirely unsuspicious, apart from their own=20 raw email address in the signature. Would it help if I forward their mails to find out why they were refused? Maybe there's something else going on? > Nevertheless, I've removed this and all other cygwin-specific > spam/mailing-list related filters. Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Maintainer Red Hat --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 819 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUBeOhAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+g2qIP/ia0CSF5bfeUfge/mxOtOJL3 B+oRlwMBJfr0oAAAlxPXNJWTItwUTCjPzxVEcEO6KS9Jk1lG32AMbJMk75DyMedZ ZBBHOIVGk3AvNrr33W6+6sQuqJ450G21mI1kI8QDXzKAw3kJX1mlfMZF1cgvT4QR baZhOPOkRPWUp64mv08XERsnHeaxUixkE7MkGfxEP9gRHi/QBdIiSwXCj3O7s7Ey CQ1Ert68+JBNyeXXkv+wiJmsT1kWhRdotgxn3uRItX4E+3XXIgU/P2ilagk9OC+X h3+t3dUxgqiyWyq7Hl9phri96H5OOzR09seGnYl4yEKBU7Pc+kwfu2s6Xu1+smsF HY6zX12+/3D+NC6Wa5i8iBzZtOU5uhSpQHNU1RRioCRqoduD0B4sVJ49BKqWex6B 26qCXyC4L0TY7qeZygInjFK9oxmMfduterglX4+uBoqU7b8vAKRbDiaR6H95L/0i /1AliILl4QnD9muAHqvyVGGG3WFuOjfvFDzUMDV2MLFQBvd5fa+CfuX+/pnVE5bS K3zUbSbZPLodTldgwhOCqcLUQh7G5Wa4cIeoeBT2TdpexUQ/HmDDMgqbtZBoKruL Ii3RDVCWGhm+3NsMAsBiZMrL5U//TWgROlMsjNpAgho7IN8EFwDhg2v9NKTsSg5j sIoXMd4hLwVdsdNSnp37 =n7WO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--