On Sep  2 13:42, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 05:34:57PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Sep  2 10:49, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> As previously explained, the block was for email addresses which might
> >> be mailing list addresses.  For instance, this was not blocked:
> >> 
> >> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-08/msg00598.html
> >
> >I have two guys of which I got copies of their emails in private mail
> >which were bounced with the "spam threshold exceeded" message.
> >Content-wise, they were entirely unsuspicious, apart from their own 
> >raw email address in the signature.
> 
> <Insert cliche about assume here>
> 
> >Would it help if I forward their mails to find out why they were
> >refused?  Maybe there's something else going on?
> 
> Wow, you apparently weren't paying attention to the 1342 times I
> responded to email whiners in the cygwin list.  Have them follow the
> directions in the bounce rather than contacting you directly.  There is
> nothing new here.
> 
> I suspect that one of the people already contacted postmaster and isn't
> reading his inbox.

Can you please stop being hostile?  Thank you.

There are no directions in the bounce.

I copied an example of this bounce to sourceware.org:~/corinna/Message01.eml

What was the problem with this mail, if it wasn't the raw email address
in the sig?

Btw., Yesterday I sent this mail with the message text inlined, then an
hour later with the message text attached.  Both of my mails to
overseers simply disappeared, without even a bounce.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat