From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13604 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2014 12:05:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13583 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2014 12:05:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:05:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s83C5EDH023265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:05:15 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-227-76.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.227.76]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s83C5E1L022831 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:05:14 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 163A758259; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:05:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:05:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Cygwin lists spam filters Message-ID: <20140903120512.GI4825@redhat.com> References: <20140902091708.GQ2644@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140902144959.GA4439@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20140902153457.GA12440@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140902174230.GA518@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20140903114932.GI6056@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903114932.GI6056@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SW-Source: 2014-q3/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 Hi - > There are no directions in the bounce. Right, in this case the message was rejected upon receipt by sourceware, so the bounce message was generated from his MTA, not sourceware. > I copied an example of this bounce to sourceware.org:~/corinna/Message01.eml > > What was the problem with this mail, if it wasn't the raw email address > in the sig? /var/log/maillog says: Aug 30 17:14:51 sourceware spamd[28769]: spamd: checking message <102829035.20140830211503@mail.ru> for qpsmtpd:89 Aug 30 17:14:53 sourceware spamd[28769]: spamd: identified spam (11.3/5.0) for qpsmtpd:89 in 2.4 seconds, 2121 bytes. Aug 30 17:14:53 sourceware spamd[28769]: spamd: result: Y 11 - AWL,BAYES_60,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPAM_BODY,SPF_PASS,UNSUBSCRIBE_BODY scantime=2.4,size=2121,user=qpsmtpd,uid=89,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=/var/run/spamd,mid=<102829035.20140830211503@mail.ru>,bayes=0.659891,autolearn=spam % spamassassin -t < $MESSAGE_FILE gives more info (but the bayes state has changed since Aug. 30): Content analysis details: (32.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 UNSUBSCRIBE_BODY BODY: UNSUBSCRIBE_BODY 6.5 GARBLED_SUBJECT GARBLED_SUBJECT 1.5 GARBLED_FROM GARBLED_FROM -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP 6.5 GARBLED_BODY BODY: GARBLED_BODY 10 SPAM_BODY BODY: SPAM_BODY 2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 80 to 95% [score: 0.9277] 1.5 BODY_8BITS BODY: Body includes 8 consecutive 8-bit characters 2.0 DSN_NO_MIMEVERSION Return-Path <> and no MIME-Version: header > Btw., Yesterday I sent this mail with the message text inlined, then > an hour later with the message text attached. Both of my mails to > overseers simply disappeared, without even a bounce. If you have the message-id, I could investigate. (Which "this"?) - FChE