From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29101 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2014 12:36:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29067 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2014 12:36:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:36:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s83Ca1rZ003111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:36:02 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-227-76.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.227.76]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s83Ca1mE008150 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:36:01 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 0DB6858259; Wed, 3 Sep 2014 08:35:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 12:36:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Cygwin lists spam filters Message-ID: <20140903123558.GK4825@redhat.com> References: <20140902091708.GQ2644@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140902144959.GA4439@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20140902153457.GA12440@calimero.vinschen.de> <20140902174230.GA518@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20140903114932.GI6056@calimero.vinschen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140903114932.GI6056@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SW-Source: 2014-q3/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 Hi - > [...] > I copied an example of this bounce to sourceware.org:~/corinna/Message01.eml > [...] In this case, it appears that the sa-update automatically-downloaded spam fingerprint regexps are misfiring, something about the presence of the word "replacement" in the body. Chris, can we make do without sa-update etc.? - FChE