From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12598 invoked by alias); 26 Dec 2014 13:32:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12590 invoked by uid 89); 26 Dec 2014 13:32:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:32:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625E11162AD; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:32:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6lSpIcqlyOi7; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:32:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7F21162A9; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:32:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E818041013; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 08:32:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:13:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: newer versions of python and git on sourceware? Message-ID: <20141226133249.GQ11973@adacore.com> References: <20141221222748.GM12884@adacore.com> <20141225020842.GA3688@elastic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141225020842.GA3688@elastic.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SW-Source: 2014-q4/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 > > [...] So, we need Python 2.7 and Git 1.9. > > What would be our options for newer versions of both being installed? > > The RH software-collections addons (/opt/rh/...) for RHEL[67] may be > satisfactory. Will investigate. Thanks a lot, Frank. That would indeed be perfect if it works out. -- Joel