From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 130566 invoked by alias); 21 May 2015 02:00:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 130554 invoked by uid 89); 21 May 2015 02:00:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-49.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: pmta2.delivery3.ore.mailhop.org Received: from pmta2.delivery3.ore.mailhop.org (HELO pmta2.delivery3.ore.mailhop.org) (54.213.22.21) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with SMTP; Thu, 21 May 2015 02:00:47 +0000 Received: from cgf.cx (unknown [173.76.50.243]) by outbound1.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPA; Thu, 21 May 2015 02:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ednor (ednor [192.168.187.5]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with SMTP id 60D0A600B6; Wed, 20 May 2015 22:00:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 May 2015 22:00:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 02:00:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Aldy Hernandez Subject: Re: Bounced messages to gcc-patches. Message-ID: <20150521020042.GA4123@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Aldy Hernandez References: <555D10BA.3070208@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <555D10BA.3070208@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2015-q2/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:54:50PM -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote: >Hi folks. > >I sent a patch to gcc-patches today with the subject of "Re: [patch >10/10] debug-early merge: compiler proper". The first time it was >silently dropped, but at least one of the recipients received it just fine. > >It had a 97k patch, which I thought could be the problem (size??). I >tried again with a gziped patch and this time I received: > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > > (reason: 552 spam score exceeded threshold) > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >... while talking to gcc.gnu.org.: > >>> DATA ><<< 552 spam score exceeded threshold >554 5.0.0 Service unavailable > >The headers files in the message that was sent back from gcc.gnu.org did >not have any indication as to why the spam socre was exceeded. > >Are my messages in limbo somewhere? Can they be released? > >Can I do anything to post my patch, or is this a subtle hint that should >I consider vacation and/or retirement? You really didn't give enough context to figure out what was responsible for the bounce. I don't see anything unusual bounced as spam with a redhat.com message-id. I've added you to the whitelist but, in the future, if you have issues please think about how you'd like to receive a bug report about a compiler problem. I need details like time, date, message-contents what email addres it was sent from and, if possible what the message-id was.