From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94323 invoked by alias); 20 May 2016 15:25:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 94309 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2016 15:25:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=aged, transmission, Collecting X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 20 May 2016 15:25:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533206331E; Fri, 20 May 2016 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche.csb (vpn-56-109.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.56.109]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4KFPQi3019177; Fri, 20 May 2016 11:25:27 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id 51E6F58C6D; Fri, 20 May 2016 11:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 15:25:00 -0000 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Collecting information about duplicated messages Message-ID: <20160520152530.GG10214@redhat.com> References: <877ferccvb.fsf@totoro.br.ibm.com> <201605190104.u4J0t2Pt012240@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201605190104.u4J0t2Pt012240@mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SW-Source: 2016-q2/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 Hi - > But, I'd appreciate if you could take a look at the logs and send me > whatever information you have about the transmission of that message [1]. >From the logs here, it simply looks like two separate messages sent a few seconds apart, as if someone may have fat-fingered "git send-email". The SMTP parts of the logs appear to have ben aged away already; increasing their retention limits now. - FChE