From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 118886 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2017 15:41:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 118870 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2017 15:41:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-101.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*MI:sk:2017043, Broken, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: cgf.cx Received: from external.cgf.cx (HELO cgf.cx) (107.170.62.102) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:41:00 +0000 Received: by cgf.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:40:59 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx BA73440607 Resent-From: Christopher Faylor Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:40:59 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: <20170430154059.GA2509@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Resent-To: overseers@sourceware.org Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:41:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Florian Weimer , overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Broken DMARC workaround for glibc mailing lists Message-ID: <20170430053402.GA6286a@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org, Florian Weimer References: <3c0d0086-7cae-87df-1208-121656b890e3@redhat.com> <20170430023242.GA869@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170430023242.GA869@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2017-q2/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:32:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:29:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >>Hi, >> >>we have received a report that at least one of the glibc mailing lists >>lacks anti-DMARC header rewriting: >> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-help/2017-04/msg00034.html >> >>I have seen the usual “via” From rewriting on other sourceware.org >>lists. I don't think we have much choice but to enable that for all the >>glibc lists, too. > >? We don't arbitrarily turn on/off features like that for different >mailing lists. This feature is on for every mailing list. I found what should have been a minor misconfiguration in libc-help mailing list configuration. I don't know if it will help or not. I'll monitor the mailing list to see if this fixes it. cgf