From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 74588 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2020 15:20:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 74555 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2020 15:20:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-99.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_SPF_HELO,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=cgf, our X-HELO: cgf.cx Received: from external.cgf.cx (HELO cgf.cx) (107.170.62.102) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:20:27 +0000 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx A3E3640B9B X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.3 spammy=lukewarm, myself, interesting, H*r:unknown Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (unknown [100.0.105.127]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:20:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:20:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:20:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: overseers@sourceware.org, Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Choice of distribution for new sourceware.org server? Message-ID: <20200206152023.GA13889@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Carlos O'Donell , overseers@sourceware.org, Florian Weimer References: <74e963de-f7c8-33d0-d133-ada427c000a4@redhat.com> <20200206013050.GA16275@cgf.cx> <20200206060547.GA1868@cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00073.txt On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 09:50:20AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >On 2/6/20 1:05 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I think I've just convinced myself to look into using postfix and >> mailman. I'll try to do that in the next few days. > >I think switching to postfix would really be to our benefit, both >from an upstream support, and long-term perspective. I'm very familiar with and very lukewarm about Postfix but it's what everyone uses so... >The archives will be an interesting challenge, but I think we can >preserve them statically. IMO, for support purposes it will be important to have a unified archive interface. cgf