From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by server2.sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD8C3947438 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 17:41:12 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx 38E194040A X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.3 spammy=rarely, They, Sun, H*r:unknown Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (unknown [100.0.105.127]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 8 Mar 2020 13:41:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 08 Mar 2020 13:41:10 -0400 Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 13:41:10 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Tobias Burnus via Overseers , overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Gerald Pfeifer , Tobias Burnus Subject: Re: GCC server =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=93_mailin?= =?utf-8?Q?g?= archive's /current no longer working Message-ID: <20200308174110.GA9565@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Tobias Burnus via Overseers , overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Gerald Pfeifer , Tobias Burnus References: <5ea64eff-45a4-b86b-a168-362c8645060c@net-b.de> <20200307195928.GA9718@cgf.cx> <20200308162748.GA7107@cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200308162748.GA7107@cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2020 17:41:13 -0000 On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 12:27:48PM -0400, Christopher Faylor via Overseers wrote: >On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 11:13:45AM +0100, Tobias Burnus via Overseers wrote: >>how about simply redirecting "/ml//current" to >>"/pipermail/"? This avoids the not-found issue and one ends up >>at the new mailing archive (albeit not for the current month, but >>that's way better than an error message). > >I experimented with that yesterday. It should work. I created the symlinks. They aren't quite the same as the old current since they point to the most recent folder with content rather than "this month's" folder. But, I think I actually would prefer that as a user since I rarely want to look at an empty folder. cgf