From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E1B395251C for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 19:47:57 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx E905540CB7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.3 spammy=H*r:unknown, lets, 20200306, let's Received: from ednor.cgf.cx (unknown [100.0.105.127]) by cgf.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:47:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ednor.cgf.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:47:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:47:55 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: overseers@sourceware.org Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , gcc mailing list , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: gcc mailing list is not being archived Message-ID: <20200309194755.GC6843@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org, "Frank Ch. Eigler" , gcc mailing list , Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= References: <10C16EF8-BC16-41AD-BCCC-4F8A53258852@tkoenig.net> <20200309141031.GB67879@elastic.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200309141031.GB67879@elastic.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FORGED_SPF_HELO, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 19:47:57 -0000 On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:10:31AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler via Overseers wrote: >Hi - > >> one more point: The gcc mailing list including this discussion is >> currently not being archived, the last message is from 2020-03-06. > >Found & fixed a permission problem with the mailmnan archives. >Let's see if this one makes it in now. I'll repopulate the archive with the missing messages when I have the chance. cgf