From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E745A385F01D for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:08:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E745A385F01D Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEzae-00017k-O8 for overseers@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:08:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, T_SPF_PERMERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:41095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEzae-00017H-GR; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:08:20 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 02JI8BKj018163; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:08:11 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 02JI89DZ018159; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:08:09 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:08:09 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Richard Biener Cc: Florian Weimer , Tom Tromey , overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc , Alexander Monakov , Overseers mailing list , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , "Frank Ch. Eigler" Subject: Re: Not usable email content encoding Message-ID: <20200319180809.GW22482@gate.crashing.org> References: <20200318142239.GF112952@elastic.org> <3af9771e-e577-f2a1-843e-c2b078bfc4ea@t-online.de> <20200318162250.GG112952@elastic.org> <87zhccsdfd.fsf@tromey.com> <87imj0pjbr.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 63.228.1.57 X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:08:22 -0000 On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 02:41:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > I guess if anything we'd want something git-centric now like github > or gitlab pull requests & reviews. The only complication is approval > then which would still mean manual steps. Patch review would also not > be publicly visible and archived(?) so both chiming in late after visible > progress and archeology would be harder. I think following all > patch reviews by clicking on websites rather than watching gcc-patches > is impractical. patchwork used to work great as an archive (it runs for GCC for almost ten years now). It is not meant as a patch review system: instead, it is meant as something for (kernel) maintainers where they can pick up patches to apply (which isn't our workflow: people apply their own patches, in general). It is also useful to find neglected patches, but that only can work if someone (or a group of people) does the work for that. This doesn't work for us. *Used to* work great... With the From: munging, it now has become quite hard (and very annoying) to navigate, and even just to read :-( Segher