* looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
@ 2020-03-17 13:33 Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-03-18 20:06 ` Don Armstrong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-03-17 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: owner; +Cc: overseers
Hi -
We have a mail loop situation happening between bugs.debian.org
and sourceware.org (= gcc.gnu.org)'s bugzilla servers. Can you
advise whether we should stop this somehow or whether you can
from your end?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3481
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=55298
Not sure what set off the two robots talking to each other,
but it wasn't entertaining the bystanders.
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
2020-03-17 13:33 looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail Frank Ch. Eigler
@ 2020-03-18 20:06 ` Don Armstrong
2020-03-18 21:21 ` Christopher Faylor
2020-03-18 22:37 ` Joseph Myers
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Don Armstrong @ 2020-03-18 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: owner, overseers
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> We have a mail loop situation happening between bugs.debian.org
> and sourceware.org (= gcc.gnu.org)'s bugzilla servers. Can you
> advise whether we should stop this somehow or whether you can
> from your end?
Your bugzilla setup is stripping off all of the X-Loop and other
relevant headers when it forwards mail it receives, so it's made it very
difficult to automatically mitigate this kind of mail loop.
I'll drop in a rule to block your bugzilla setup to sending messages to
bugs.debian.org to mitigate this in the future.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
There is no more concentrated form of evil
than apathy.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
2020-03-18 20:06 ` Don Armstrong
@ 2020-03-18 21:21 ` Christopher Faylor
2020-03-22 20:38 ` Don Armstrong
2020-03-18 22:37 ` Joseph Myers
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2020-03-18 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: owner, Overseers mailing list
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:06:07PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>> We have a mail loop situation happening between bugs.debian.org
>> and sourceware.org (= gcc.gnu.org)'s bugzilla servers. Can you
>> advise whether we should stop this somehow or whether you can
>> from your end?
>
>Your bugzilla setup is stripping off all of the X-Loop and other
>relevant headers when it forwards mail it receives, so it's made it very
>difficult to automatically mitigate this kind of mail loop.
Please forgive my ignorance, but what should the X-Loop header look
like? Would this be something that you added and we stripped or
something that we didn't add?
We recently changed hardware and updated to a newer linux distro for
sourceware.org and there are still some software issues to work out.
So, if we need to change something here we'll be glad to do so.
>I'll drop in a rule to block your bugzilla setup to sending messages to
>bugs.debian.org to mitigate this in the future.
We have a rule to prevent the loop too but if we're missing something
here we'd like to fix it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
2020-03-18 20:06 ` Don Armstrong
2020-03-18 21:21 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2020-03-18 22:37 ` Joseph Myers
2020-03-19 3:28 ` Christopher Faylor
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Myers @ 2020-03-18 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: owner, Overseers mailing list; +Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler, Don Armstrong
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Don Armstrong via Overseers wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > We have a mail loop situation happening between bugs.debian.org
> > and sourceware.org (= gcc.gnu.org)'s bugzilla servers. Can you
> > advise whether we should stop this somehow or whether you can
> > from your end?
>
> Your bugzilla setup is stripping off all of the X-Loop and other
> relevant headers when it forwards mail it receives, so it's made it very
> difficult to automatically mitigate this kind of mail loop.
I'm not sure if Bugzilla has any connection between the incoming and
outgoing emails. It may just generate a comment from an incoming email,
and generate an outgoing email from a new comment independent of how that
comment was added.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
2020-03-18 22:37 ` Joseph Myers
@ 2020-03-19 3:28 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2020-03-19 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Overseers mailing list; +Cc: owner, Don Armstrong
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:37:10PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Don Armstrong via Overseers wrote:
>>On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>>We have a mail loop situation happening between bugs.debian.org and
>>>sourceware.org (= gcc.gnu.org)'s bugzilla servers. Can you advise
>>>whether we should stop this somehow or whether you can from your end?
>>
>>Your bugzilla setup is stripping off all of the X-Loop and other
>>relevant headers when it forwards mail it receives, so it's made it
>>very difficult to automatically mitigate this kind of mail loop.
>
>I'm not sure if Bugzilla has any connection between the incoming and
>outgoing emails. It may just generate a comment from an incoming
>email, and generate an outgoing email from a new comment independent of
>how that comment was added.
That was my understanding too but maybe we could just automatically add
an X-Loop for the email address from the comment if that helped.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
2020-03-18 21:21 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2020-03-22 20:38 ` Don Armstrong
2020-03-22 20:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Don Armstrong @ 2020-03-22 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: owner, Overseers mailing list, Frank Ch. Eigler
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:06:07PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> >On Tue, 17 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> >> We have a mail loop situation happening between bugs.debian.org
> >> and sourceware.org (= gcc.gnu.org)'s bugzilla servers. Can you
> >> advise whether we should stop this somehow or whether you can
> >> from your end?
> >
> >Your bugzilla setup is stripping off all of the X-Loop and other
> >relevant headers when it forwards mail it receives, so it's made it very
> >difficult to automatically mitigate this kind of mail loop.
>
> Please forgive my ignorance, but what should the X-Loop header look
> like?
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org is what we add to all of our outgoing
messages to try to track mail loops.
> Would this be something that you added and we stripped or something
> that we didn't add?
Something that we add, but Bugzilla strips out. The general problem is
that incoming messages are connected to outgoing messages without
maintaining the e-mail headers from the incoming message. [You really
should keep all of the References, X-Loop, and Received headers at a
minimum.]
We're probably partly to blame, because we haven't changed our setup to
account for RFC 3834, which I'll file a bug to add eventually.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
You could say to the Universe this is not /fair/. And the Universe
would say: Oh it isn't? Sorry.
-- Terry Pratchett _Soul Music_ p357
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
2020-03-22 20:38 ` Don Armstrong
@ 2020-03-22 20:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-03-22 21:50 ` Don Armstrong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-03-22 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: owner, Overseers mailing list; +Cc: Frank Ch. Eigler, Don Armstrong
Hi -
> X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org is what we add to all of our outgoing
> messages to try to track mail loops.
OK.
> > Would this be something that you added and we stripped or something
> > that we didn't add?
>
> Something that we add, but Bugzilla strips out. The general problem is
> that incoming messages are connected to outgoing messages without
> maintaining the e-mail headers from the incoming message. [You really
> should keep all of the References, X-Loop, and Received headers at a
> minimum.]
Thing is bugzilla is not forwarding emails. Bugzilla appends as a
comment the body of the message. Then it sends out a new notification
email to all the various subscribers of that bug, which includes the
originator. And the originator was the pseudo-userid over
@bugs.debian. So it wasn't a direct mail loop.
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
2020-03-22 20:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
@ 2020-03-22 21:50 ` Don Armstrong
2020-03-22 21:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Don Armstrong @ 2020-03-22 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frank Ch. Eigler; +Cc: owner, Overseers mailing list, Frank Ch. Eigler
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > Something that we add, but Bugzilla strips out. The general problem
> > is that incoming messages are connected to outgoing messages without
> > maintaining the e-mail headers from the incoming message. [You
> > really should keep all of the References, X-Loop, and Received
> > headers at a minimum.]
>
> Thing is bugzilla is not forwarding emails. Bugzilla appends as a
> comment the body of the message. Then it sends out a new notification
> email to all the various subscribers of that bug, which includes the
> originator. And the originator was the pseudo-userid over
> @bugs.debian. So it wasn't a direct mail loop.
It may not be directly forwarding them, but the net effect is the same.
[In fact, if it was directly forwarding them, it might not have been so
bad...]
If you receive a mail message and send a mail message in response to
that mail message, you're vulnerable to mail loops, and should retain
message headers which are used to detect and avoid mail loops.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
I have no use for "before and after" pictures.
I can't remember starting, and I'm never done.
-- a softer world #221
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=221
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail
2020-03-22 21:50 ` Don Armstrong
@ 2020-03-22 21:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Frank Ch. Eigler @ 2020-03-22 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: owner; +Cc: Overseers mailing list, Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi -
Another way to break the loop is to make clear which bug tracker
is the master, which is a replica. If sourceware/gcc's bugzilla
is the master upstream, then the debian one can RECEIVE updates
from it, but need not SEND (and especially RESEND) updates to it.
- FChE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-22 21:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-17 13:33 looping gcc/bugzilla <-> bugs.debian mail Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-03-18 20:06 ` Don Armstrong
2020-03-18 21:21 ` Christopher Faylor
2020-03-22 20:38 ` Don Armstrong
2020-03-22 20:40 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-03-22 21:50 ` Don Armstrong
2020-03-22 21:53 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2020-03-18 22:37 ` Joseph Myers
2020-03-19 3:28 ` Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).