From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F37386F465 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:11:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C9F37386F465 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-245-VtiKOJ8RP_KZzba-avldvg-1; Wed, 06 May 2020 10:11:44 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VtiKOJ8RP_KZzba-avldvg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D3441009443; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-112-83.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.83]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A8F5C1B5; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:11:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 046EBdj2012351; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:11:40 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 046EBd2Y012350; Wed, 6 May 2020 16:11:39 +0200 Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 16:11:39 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: GCC Development Cc: Overseers mailing list Subject: Stability of pipermail ml archive URLs Message-ID: <20200506141139.GJ2375@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 14:11:50 -0000 Hi! Last week after sending status report mails to gcc mailing list, I've opened the web archive and copied the URLs of those status reports https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/232267.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/232268.html and checked them into gcc-wwwdocs git c3162d9e711d3e32935c17d1451c63839d702019 revision. But today people are complaining that those links don't work anymore and those mails have https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/000504.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-April/000505.html URLs instead. Martin Jambor also said he has posted a URL into the archive https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/231851.html which is now instead https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232205.html Looking around, the last two months of gcc now have very small numbers, but e.g. on gcc-patches the mails have very high numbers like 545238.html. Can pipermail provide stable URLs at all? We really need those, we reference those in commit messages, other mails, bugzilla etc. =09Jakub