From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=95iz=DR=gcc.gnu.org=cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@cgf.cx>
Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BE03857C5C
 for <overseers@gcc.gnu.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 19:52:37 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 46BE03857C5C
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx BAA98404AA
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,
 KAM_SHORT,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
 spammy=person, H*M:cgf, white, who
Received: by cgf.cx (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:52:34 -0400
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 15:52:34 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@gcc.gnu.org>
To: "Pandey, Sunil K via Overseers" <overseers@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Pandey, Sunil K" <sunil.k.pandey@intel.com>,
 "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: GCC Regression analysis mail marked as spam (previous:
 [r11-3760 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/variant/visit_neg.cc (test for excess
 errors) on Linux/x86_64)
Message-ID: <20201010195234.GA17557@cgf.cx>
Mail-Followup-To: "Pandey, Sunil K via Overseers" <overseers@gcc.gnu.org>,
 "Pandey, Sunil K" <sunil.k.pandey@intel.com>,
 "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
References: <BY5PR11MB4292403E132A423232E4432BCE090@BY5PR11MB4292.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4292403E132A423232E4432BCE090@BY5PR11MB4292.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Overseers mailing list <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/overseers>,
 <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/overseers>,
 <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 19:52:38 -0000

On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 12:11:29AM +0000, Pandey, Sunil K via Overseers wrote:
>Hi GCC Overseers,
>
>I run gcc regression analysis every hour and send mail to committer, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org in case of regression. For some reason following mail marked as spam. Attached is undelivered message.
>
>Can you please investigate/fix it, so that regression analysis mail doesn't get marked as spam?

I've added you to the white list.

Please don't send email issus to overseers.  The correct place for
gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org/cygwin.com is to send problems to either
postmaster or <mailinglist>-owner.

You reach the right person here but you also spam a bunch of other
people who can't help with email issues. Also, overseers@gcc... and
oversers@sourceware... are the same thing.

Please pass this along.