From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3001C384B822 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:32:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 3001C384B822 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-40-S6wKYht-PMWLUBs7uk1eww-1; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 09:32:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: S6wKYht-PMWLUBs7uk1eww-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6B3D80B70A; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (ovpn-113-127.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.127]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E90BA63; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 14:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 0A5EWZhT3361161 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:32:35 +0100 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 0A5EWXU23361160; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:32:33 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 15:32:33 +0100 From: Jakub Jelinek To: overseers@sourceware.org, Joseph Myers Subject: Re: gcc/DATESTAMP not updated any longer Message-ID: <20201105143233.GB3788@tucnak> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20201102194357.GI3788@tucnak> <30cf614e-814a-aa3f-b31f-91f6104b833a@suse.cz> <20201102205849.GL3788@tucnak> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 14:32:43 -0000 On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 06:26:58PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > > > It isn't that easy (because update_version_git checks the gcc trunk and > > so I had to insert a sh invocation in which I've tweaked it), but it worked, > > thanks. But something is really wrong with the hooks, as the gcc-cvs mail > > for the trunk daily bump wasn't sent again (r10, r9 and r8 changes did). > > I think any issue with an email not sent to gcc-cvs should be raised with > overseers or postmaster; they'll need to check logs at the exact time to > see if the email was ever submitted by the hooks to the MTA (and at least > part of the mail sending from the hooks is I think asynchronous so any > issues might not be reported back to the git commit command). If it was > submitted to the MTA, the problem is with the MTA or mailman. If it was > not submitted to the MTA, Joel might be able to advise on how to > instrument the process of email sending from the hooks to see where it > went wrong. The mails that are missing from gcc-cvs (both archives and haven't been delivered to me) are e.g. "[gcc r11-4730] Daily bump." mail from 00:17 GMT today, ditto yesterday "[gcc r11-4702] Daily bump.", ditto from 3 days ago "[gcc r11-4631] Daily bump.", but it isn't just the daily bumps, e.g. on September 17th, I don't see mails "[gcc r8-10474]" through "[gcc r8-10514]" inclusive being mailed nor making it into gcc bugzilla through gcc-bugs ml (it was part of a git push of 61 commits together, and only the first 20 got mailed and remaining 41 didn't). Could somebody from overseers please have a a look at the mail logs? Thanks. Jakub