From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2862D3856DF2 for ; Thu, 19 May 2022 23:33:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2862D3856DF2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx 7D55656D9C X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 spammy=H*ct:iso-8859-1, H*M:cgf, deliver Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 19:33:39 -0400 From: cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please@sourceware.org To: Kurt Goebel Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gprofng project page Message-ID: <20220519233339.jgzp7bnzzy24qqpe@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Kurt Goebel , overseers@sourceware.org References: <38da29dc-1362-7c13-7eac-d998ee54ef0a@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <38da29dc-1362-7c13-7eac-d998ee54ef0a@oracle.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05, FORGED_SOURCEWARE, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 23:33:43 -0000 The overseers mailing list is where these types of issues are discussed. I suspect the answer is "Yes". Forwarding to overseers. cgf On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 02:43:43PM -0400, Kurt Goebel wrote: >Hello, > >I'm working on a new binutils tool called gprofng along with the gprofng tool maintainer >Vladimir Mezentsev and another developer Ruud van der Pas. > >We are starting to see collaborative interest within and outside the current GNU community >and need a place to host info that will help these future    developers. > >We would like to collect, deliver, and collaborate on some additional gprofng related info >such as: > > - potential gprofng enhancement wish list > - pointers to presentations about gprofng > - porting info for gprofng > - FAQs for gprofng > >This seems to be similar to other project pages currently on sourceware.org. > >Would it be possible to host such a project page on sourceware.org? > >Kurt Goebel