From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE8BE3858D3C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:42:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org DE8BE3858D3C X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx A848896780 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 spammy=Tokens not available. Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 13:42:35 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: move bugzilla account request email to another list? Message-ID: <20220901174235.4pigzp2ipbevljks@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Carlos O'Donell , overseers@sourceware.org References: <20220901163010.4v2i6qi5jwhjfib4@cgf.cx> <07505d42-2cf9-1eb5-6c6c-231957803ac5@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <07505d42-2cf9-1eb5-6c6c-231957803ac5@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 17:42:40 -0000 On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 01:35:20PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >On 9/1/22 12:30, Christopher Faylor via Overseers wrote: >> I think we've reached the point where the bugzilla account request email >> should be moved to another list. As it stands now, I have a tendency >> to ignore this list because most of the traffic does not really pertain >> to overseeing sourceware.org. >> >> Could we move these requests elsewhere and maybe even automate them? > >Moving them to another list is a good idea. > >I wonder if we can't queue them up for handling in some way? Does the simple fact that someone went to the effort of sending email qualify them as "not spammy"? If so, then I'd say yes. cgf