public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: "Zoë Kooyman via Overseers" <overseers@sourceware.org>
Cc: "Zoë Kooyman" <zoe@fsf.org>
Subject: Re: Sourceware / GNU Toolchain at Cauldron
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2022 18:27:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220918162733.GB27812@gnu.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AE0DB51B-70EF-4D50-AF93-3094CC30C20D@fsf.org>

Hi Zoë,

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 04:57:36PM -0400, Zoë Kooyman via Overseers wrote:
> We are aware that several presentations will be given at
> Cauldron this weekend proposing new ways to support the Sourceware
> project and the GNU Toolchain packages hosted there.
>
> The FSF has been a fiscal sponsor to the GNU Toolchain for several
> years (and continues to be), and has been grateful to have
> Sourceware providing development infrastructure using free
> software. Unfortunately, we won't have staff present at Cauldron,
> but we are keeping up with the development of the various proposals
> and talking with people involved, as well as seeing how we might be
> able to offer support to help make good things happen.
>
> We want Sourceware and the GNU packages it hosts to have stable
> homes and strong futures in freedom. We expect the conversations in
> the next few days to be open and transparent and involving the
> community, and look forward to discussing the best way(s) forward in
> the coming weeks.

Thanks. I am really happy you are actively involved. I also want to
thank Bradley and Karen from the SFC for calling into the
discussion. But the discussion at Cauldron seemed really chaotic, I
have trouble trying to summarize it. I posted my original discussion
notes and first impressions here:
https://gnu.wildebeest.org/blog/mjw/2022/09/18/sourceware-infrastructure-conservancy-gnu-toolchain-at-cauldron/

We agreed to continue the discussion on this mailinglist. Hopefully
that will be a little more productive and structured.

Cheers,

Mark

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-18 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-16 20:57 Zoë Kooyman
2022-09-16 21:10 ` Ian Kelling
2022-09-18 16:27 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
2022-09-18 21:38   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-09-19 21:09     ` Mark Wielaard
2022-09-26 22:04     ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-09-27  1:31       ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-09-27 11:02       ` Mark Wielaard
2022-09-28 11:14       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-09-30 13:38         ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-10-02 14:55           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-03 13:26             ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-03 13:53               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-03 19:16                 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-03 15:55               ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220918162733.GB27812@gnu.wildebeest.org \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    --cc=zoe@fsf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).