From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E07385356A for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:22:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D3E07385356A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=sourceware.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cgf.cx X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx 52849FB5B4 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 spammy=Tokens not available. Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:22:46 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: Overseers mailing list Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project Message-ID: <20220930152246.nbwwkmxvsy4aeqxe@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , Overseers mailing list References: <91af050b-c02a-23c8-2002-4740708b251f@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91af050b-c02a-23c8-2002-4740708b251f@gotplt.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 List-Id: On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 10:35:45AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >>I get the feeling also there is too many corporations trying to push >>the way forward with this proposal rather than a true open source >>community. > >It is a fact that most people on the steering committee, stewards, etc. >are paid by corporations to work on the GNU toolchain. Claiming that >they're doing this for their company's interests rather than in the >interest of the upstream project itself is unfair to them IMO. Are the only corporations associated with the GTI those who have employees working on the "GNU Toolchain"? This argument only works, IMO, if that is true. Otherwise it could be construed as corporations who have no direct stake in "GNU Toolchain" development influencing development because they provide $$$. cgf