From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cgf.cx (external.cgf.cx [107.170.62.102]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151A63858C56; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 18:25:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 151A63858C56 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=sourceware.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cgf.cx X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 cgf.cx A219E10FE54 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-CGF-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 spammy=Tokens not available. Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 14:25:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: Overseers mailing list Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Zo=C3=AB?= Kooyman Subject: Re: Toolchain Infrastructure project statement of support Message-ID: <20221013182529.sm76fysq37sv754x@cgf.cx> Mail-Followup-To: Overseers mailing list , gdb@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?Zo=C3=AB?= Kooyman References: <2513b668-9ebd-9e78-7263-dc24f4a9558a@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2513b668-9ebd-9e78-7263-dc24f4a9558a@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 List-Id: Re: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2022q4/018981.html On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:43:09PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >The GNU Toolchain project leadership supports the proposal[1] to move the >services for the GNU Toolchain to the Linux Foundation IT under the auspices of >the Toolchain Infrastructure project (GTI) with fiscal sponsorship from the >OpenSSF and other major donors. Noted, however, a list of signatories does not automatically confer authority over any particular project.  Any participation from  overseers in moving projects to different infrastructure will require clear approval from the individual projects themselves. Also, the FSF, being the existing fiscal sponsor to these projects, surely needs to review the formal agreements before we sunset our infrastructural offerings to glibc, gcc, binutils, and gdb and hand control of the projects' infrastructure over to a different entity. We'd like to assure the communities that, when and if any individual project formally expresses the decision of their developers to transfer their services, we'll endeavor to make the move as smooth as possible.  Those projects that wish to stay will continue to receive the best services that the overseers can offer, with the ongoing assistance of Red Hat, the SFC, and, when relevant, the FSF tech team.