From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768123858D20 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:23:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 768123858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 768123858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712874212; cv=none; b=lf+jQ11bEv868zgUa+o8p9WPNavGvLl3ZRFi7qQHByXiOd3U/kvzJblX4r/FAeQ2NTDjs3bHDFo3e7EnsBXMODwjbbnycnQ3X2j9F9h3H+ytiXJ2vimEUbjCehoF/GY2RqF/gsuyubL0OIvuQJW4a9kuiYoEHYQVfyVO+eJTCN8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712874212; c=relaxed/simple; bh=18mdifk3LFzBDt/g/SUMLPlBs6hd1nxsnAo6Zt7/MQU=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=GfJ4ZMXoM9AZPL1H+x7TDA4SgfysoQu+0Z0HbO5Ahy/Fb42aWLd9Co+QPkl/Td3NozPRjm/8twQtuyNr0BLF9rZbwQc9dhmd68MgnengX08D5wBYdjeBhQcVoXMY1rmp+31WLiolGA3i4b/ICDwjF3teQRB0HzXUtjW5omR4X6c= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1712874211; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1JLjnDidqKJAYBtPQa93ZLhHbt4OkhOD94gSoYGsr/0=; b=FV+JDBs5W4AVgIhq4CUEU6OAVV0aVMVlmpYkCzLyf6eD3bxQfunk1JUNjCKie8/nfcpiEv hMIfY18lNBeTgf54Rhes0wwOwJZzL1HAL99o7aOUHCk6ixXDqCv0aCXq76eElEzk5hJffD 5RkqqAbDwCVp88LFEsOlr22rYWtx+ok= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-299-OKFH-ZSuPX2cA5JKwPRvcw-1; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:23:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OKFH-ZSuPX2cA5JKwPRvcw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A71F8AA382; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.22.16.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E013C2C7FD; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 22:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fche by redhat.com with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rv2pI-0003FA-VE; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:23:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:23:24 -0400 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Overseers mailing list Cc: Mark Wielaard , Claudio Bantaloukas Subject: Re: Considerations on a gitlab-style forge Message-ID: <20240411222324.GA12335@redhat.com> References: <2668eef94323fc75e43632b2ead4fa5249eaea67.camel@klomp.org> <7e164cb4-6385-4c2a-b916-3d9631844d87@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7e164cb4-6385-4c2a-b916-3d9631844d87@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.0 (2019-05-25) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.8 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi - > Thank you for answering, I've been trying to come up with a high level > reason why something about those forges is desirable to people like me > and the best I could come up with is this. > > Having a single place where a developer can see: > [...] > - any code review comments their fellow developers may have Yeah, that seems to be the main benefit, easier than email threads. > - whether these changes are likely to break things for others That's hard to know unless you share code & inter-merge, which is not automatic in web-forge type systems, and can be done via personal or development branches in the current system too. > - what others are working on (You cannot know that. :-) > - that doesn't feel like Donald Norman's proverbial teapot! No comment! - FChE