public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: overseers@sourceware.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
	binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Sourceware Survey results and Budget priority discussions
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 21:20:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260412192052.GA15385@gnu.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409141849.GD7048@gnu.wildebeest.org>

On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 04:18:49PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The results of the Sourceware Survey 2026 are in!
> https://sourceware.org/survey-2026
> 
> And since tomorrow is the second Friday of the month it is also
> Sourceware Open Office time!
> 
> Come and lets discuss the Survey results and see what they mean for
> our Budget priorities this year.

For those that couldn't attend:

- Discussed upgrading forgejo and moving the forge to a bigger faster
  virtual machine (vm02) in the new datacenter this weekend. The new
  setup is like the forge-stage setup, so it will be easier to move to
  an Ansible setup and more admins can help out.

  [This has now been completed, please yell and scream if
  https://forge.sourceware.org is acting up after the transfer.]

- https://sourceware.org/survey-2026
  The survey ran from Friday, 20 March to Friday, 3 April. There were
  84 responses. Which amounts to ~20% of "active developers",
  depending how you define that (there are ~400 people with
  ssh/gitolite push access, if you ignore those that have been
  explicitly disabled because of non-activity). Of those that
  responded ~70% are active committers, ~60% has a bugzilla account,
  ~31% edit wikis, ~30% have editbugs rights, ~26% has a forge
  account, 20% has a patchwork account, ~12% are bugzilla admins and
  ~13% are admins/list moderators.

- There was various actionable feedback to help contributors feel
  engaged and maybe become more regular contributors. The most
  requested initiative (26%) was Forgejo process improvements. The
  least requested were hardware keys (11%). But it wasn't clear if
  people had fully read the plans descriptions at
  https://sourceware.org/sourceware-security-vision.html#plans
  One of the issues discussed was what a dedicated sysadmin could do
  for us. So we probably should expand the written out plans a bit and
  integrate the other feedback.

- Cygwin has some requirements no other project as because they want
  to produce Windows binaries. But we currently don't have a Windows
  buildbot builder to move off using Appveyor and GitHub (issue for
  some contributors). Also there is no CodeSign support. We will
  discuss options with OSUOSL and Conservancy.

- Good to see ~10% has donated to Sourceware
  https://sourceware.org/donate last year we estimated that to
  replace/renew hardware we would need ~3 years. It looks like we can
  fill out hardware fund in just ~1 year.

- Next up is updating our budget proposals with the new feedback and
  create a write up for our individual/corporate/grant organizations
  and donors to present with the new (financial) year overview (which
  starts May 15th).

- For the forge Claudio is working on the big patch set for "Send all
  PR discussion to mailing list"
  https://forge.sourceware.org/forge/batrachomyomachia/issues/15
  Done is the functionality that deals with the situations where
  people perform reviews, explicitly ask for review, send a command
  and send a single comment. Todo is when a pull request is closed and
  a summary must be sent and a manual "send everything to the mailing
  list" to deal with all the existing closed pull requests.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-12 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-09 14:18 Mark Wielaard
2026-04-12 19:20 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260412192052.GA15385@gnu.wildebeest.org \
    --to=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).