From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: overseers@sourceware.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Sourceware Survey results and Budget priority discussions
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 21:20:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260412192052.GA15385@gnu.wildebeest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409141849.GD7048@gnu.wildebeest.org>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 04:18:49PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> The results of the Sourceware Survey 2026 are in!
> https://sourceware.org/survey-2026
>
> And since tomorrow is the second Friday of the month it is also
> Sourceware Open Office time!
>
> Come and lets discuss the Survey results and see what they mean for
> our Budget priorities this year.
For those that couldn't attend:
- Discussed upgrading forgejo and moving the forge to a bigger faster
virtual machine (vm02) in the new datacenter this weekend. The new
setup is like the forge-stage setup, so it will be easier to move to
an Ansible setup and more admins can help out.
[This has now been completed, please yell and scream if
https://forge.sourceware.org is acting up after the transfer.]
- https://sourceware.org/survey-2026
The survey ran from Friday, 20 March to Friday, 3 April. There were
84 responses. Which amounts to ~20% of "active developers",
depending how you define that (there are ~400 people with
ssh/gitolite push access, if you ignore those that have been
explicitly disabled because of non-activity). Of those that
responded ~70% are active committers, ~60% has a bugzilla account,
~31% edit wikis, ~30% have editbugs rights, ~26% has a forge
account, 20% has a patchwork account, ~12% are bugzilla admins and
~13% are admins/list moderators.
- There was various actionable feedback to help contributors feel
engaged and maybe become more regular contributors. The most
requested initiative (26%) was Forgejo process improvements. The
least requested were hardware keys (11%). But it wasn't clear if
people had fully read the plans descriptions at
https://sourceware.org/sourceware-security-vision.html#plans
One of the issues discussed was what a dedicated sysadmin could do
for us. So we probably should expand the written out plans a bit and
integrate the other feedback.
- Cygwin has some requirements no other project as because they want
to produce Windows binaries. But we currently don't have a Windows
buildbot builder to move off using Appveyor and GitHub (issue for
some contributors). Also there is no CodeSign support. We will
discuss options with OSUOSL and Conservancy.
- Good to see ~10% has donated to Sourceware
https://sourceware.org/donate last year we estimated that to
replace/renew hardware we would need ~3 years. It looks like we can
fill out hardware fund in just ~1 year.
- Next up is updating our budget proposals with the new feedback and
create a write up for our individual/corporate/grant organizations
and donors to present with the new (financial) year overview (which
starts May 15th).
- For the forge Claudio is working on the big patch set for "Send all
PR discussion to mailing list"
https://forge.sourceware.org/forge/batrachomyomachia/issues/15
Done is the functionality that deals with the situations where
people perform reviews, explicitly ask for review, send a command
and send a single comment. Todo is when a pull request is closed and
a summary must be sent and a manual "send everything to the mailing
list" to deal with all the existing closed pull requests.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-12 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 14:18 Mark Wielaard
2026-04-12 19:20 ` Mark Wielaard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260412192052.GA15385@gnu.wildebeest.org \
--to=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).