Re: subversion status on gcc.gnu.org

["Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>]

On 4/6/20 5:04 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
> 
>> That is r105377 till r105390 was only ever done on a test SVN repo and
>> r105927 (hooks) was the first commit to SVN after the conversion from
> 
> Actually r105926 (creating the hooks directory) was the first commit in
> the real SVN conversion.  But in addition to SVN hooks deliberately not
> being converted to git, commits that only create / remote empty
> directories generally weren't converted, as git doesn't represent empty
> directories so such commits would be empty, and thus not idiomatically
> present at all, in git.
> 
> As for the question about r12345 (cvs2svn-generated creation of a tag that
> was deleted shortly after the move from CVS to SVN), it's in git as commit
> 229098288e4883d3b78400650e0b4143e12d0a76.

Hi.

You are right, one can really find the git commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=229098288e4883d3b78400650e0b4143e12d0a76

?  Given a mirror of the full
> repository, refs/deleted/r106023.256/tags/libc-960701 points to that
> commit - it's not a very useful commit, but it's there if you have the
> full repository.

Can you please help me how can one clone (or pull) complete content of git repo?

>  Maybe the RewriteMap was generated based on the
> fetched-by-default parts of the repository and should be regenerated based
> on a mirror clone to get everything converted from an SVN commit to a git
> commit?

Yes, it was based on normal git repo one can get from git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git.

Thanks,
Martin