From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: [alan@SPRI.Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au: [postmaster@sourceware] qmailsetup problem for binutils list] Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <398238C8.5C505D0D@cygnus.com> References: X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00905.html Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2000, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > I believe there is an RBL address you can use to only test for sites > > which have been shown to relay. I think it is output.orbs.org. > > This looks like a good compromise! > > The first is a real open relay, which is indeed listed by outputs > > taygeta[84]:~/x% host -a 16.56.236.132.outputs.orbs.org > 16.56.236.132.outputs.orbs.org A 127.0.0.3 > 16.56.236.132.outputs.orbs.org TXT "Open relay output - see.... > > taygeta[85]:~/x% host -a 1.111.15.203.outputs.orbs.org > 1.111.15.203.outputs.orbs.org does not exist (Authoritative answer) > > taygeta[87]:~/x% host -a 1.111.15.203.relays.orbs.org > 1.111.15.203.relays.orbs.org A 127.0.0.4 > 1.111.15.203.relays.orbs.org TXT "Telstra - spam haveners.... > > The final two are for the IP that started this thread. It seems this is > the behavior we want.. Please do this. To give this context, black listing telstra is roughly equivalent to black listing AT&T on the grounds that Tele-marketers use AT&T exchanges to route their phone calls. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: [alan@SPRI.Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au: [postmaster@sourceware] qmailsetup problem for binutils list] Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <398238C8.5C505D0D@cygnus.com> References: X-SW-Source: 2000-q3/msg00196.html Message-ID: <20000728185200.qqARs-ELgd3cen7uAf0Ab4vfdITkow1BZ2dWrT83mW4@z> Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2000, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > I believe there is an RBL address you can use to only test for sites > > which have been shown to relay. I think it is output.orbs.org. > > This looks like a good compromise! > > The first is a real open relay, which is indeed listed by outputs > > taygeta[84]:~/x% host -a 16.56.236.132.outputs.orbs.org > 16.56.236.132.outputs.orbs.org A 127.0.0.3 > 16.56.236.132.outputs.orbs.org TXT "Open relay output - see.... > > taygeta[85]:~/x% host -a 1.111.15.203.outputs.orbs.org > 1.111.15.203.outputs.orbs.org does not exist (Authoritative answer) > > taygeta[87]:~/x% host -a 1.111.15.203.relays.orbs.org > 1.111.15.203.relays.orbs.org A 127.0.0.4 > 1.111.15.203.relays.orbs.org TXT "Telstra - spam haveners.... > > The final two are for the IP that started this thread. It seems this is > the behavior we want.. Please do this. To give this context, black listing telstra is roughly equivalent to black listing AT&T on the grounds that Tele-marketers use AT&T exchanges to route their phone calls. Andrew