From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27378 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2001 22:20:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27334 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2001 22:20:10 -0000 Message-ID: <3BFC28AD.5070903@bothner.com> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:37:00 -0000 From: Per Bothner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lance Taylor CC: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sourceware.org References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >I noticed that the domain name sourceware.org was available. For my >own amusement, I bought it, and pointed it at sources.redhat.com. You >can now look at http://sourceware.org/ and http://www.sourceware.org/. >You can also send mail @sourceware.org. > >sourceware.com is not, alas, available. > The reason we switches from "sourceware" was because somebody had trademarked "sourceware", and it was felt that was a problem. So unless the situation has changed, using sourceware.org may not be a good idea. --Per From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Per Bothner To: Ian Lance Taylor Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3BFC28AD.5070903@bothner.com> References: X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/msg00310.html Message-ID: <20011121142000.Xe7XByKkL8TSfGHVXC4laIGJBBPLNtnaJ008ZDuL6fE@z> Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >I noticed that the domain name sourceware.org was available. For my >own amusement, I bought it, and pointed it at sources.redhat.com. You >can now look at http://sourceware.org/ and http://www.sourceware.org/ . >You can also send mail @sourceware.org. > >sourceware.com is not, alas, available. > The reason we switches from "sourceware" was because somebody had trademarked "sourceware", and it was felt that was a problem. So unless the situation has changed, using sourceware.org may not be a good idea. --Per