From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7801 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2003 15:41:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7784 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 15:41:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jifvik.dyndns.org) (62.253.130.87) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 15:41:01 -0000 Received: from jifvik.org (garibaldi.jifvik.org [172.31.1.2]) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE8B38411 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:40:23 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3E64C8F8.1060305@jifvik.org> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 15:41:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021203 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 I've been thinking about the increased use of sourceware.org. In particular, I've been wondering about whether something like using ecos.sourceware.org might be a good idea. But if we listed that as the "canonical" site for eCos stuff, could we be bitten by that trademark problem, or has that gone away now? Just wondering anyway, Jifl -- --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine