From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2449 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2003 01:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2442 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2003 01:00:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jifvik.dyndns.org) (81.104.194.28) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jul 2003 01:00:49 -0000 Received: from jifvik.org (garibaldi.jifvik.org [172.31.1.2]) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D789E37485; Mon, 14 Jul 2003 02:00:43 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3F1200BB.9070604@jifvik.org> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 01:00:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Can't ssh into sources References: <3F116CC1.5020703@jifvik.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > > >>I'm a bit bemused by what's been going on... firstly why isn't the above a >>CNAME? And secondly why weren't the TTLs reduced as is normal practice for > > > A mail domain shouldn't be a CNAME. See e.g. > . Oops, true. I was only thinking of the A record, but forget to recall that a CNAME prevents a separate MX record. Jifl -- --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine