* ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts
@ 2003-08-05 14:41 Jonathan Larmour
2003-08-05 15:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-10-08 12:28 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2003-08-05 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
Can someone possibly add ecos.sourceware.org to the qmail allowed
rcpthosts please? Then we can get mailing lists accepting mail for that
too giving more consistency.
Thanks!
Jifl
--
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts
2003-08-05 14:41 ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts Jonathan Larmour
@ 2003-08-05 15:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-10-08 12:28 ` Jonathan Larmour
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-08-05 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: overseers
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:41:49PM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>Can someone possibly add ecos.sourceware.org to the qmail allowed
>rcpthosts please? Then we can get mailing lists accepting mail for that
>too giving more consistency.
Done.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts
2003-08-05 14:41 ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts Jonathan Larmour
2003-08-05 15:14 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-10-08 12:28 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-10-08 14:50 ` Christopher Faylor
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2003-10-08 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
Ping? I should add that if there's anything else other than qmail
rcpthosts required for the qmail/ezmlm to accept mail for
ecos.sourceware.org, then please do that :-). This includes changing the
configuration giving the "canonical" list address that goes in the List-*
headers.
Thanks!
Jifl
Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Can someone possibly add ecos.sourceware.org to the qmail allowed
> rcpthosts please? Then we can get mailing lists accepting mail for that
> too giving more consistency.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jifl
--
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts
2003-10-08 12:28 ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2003-10-08 14:50 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-10-08 18:51 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-10-08 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Larmour; +Cc: overseers
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:28:37PM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>Ping?
I added ecos.sourceware.org to rcpthosts.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts
2003-10-08 14:50 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-10-08 18:51 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-10-08 22:32 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2003-10-08 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:28:37PM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>
>>Ping?
>
>
> I added ecos.sourceware.org to rcpthosts.
It works fine, thanks! I guess getting the list headers to also say
ecos.sourceware.org is more difficult, looking at the separate tree of
ezmlm stuff required for gcc.gnu.org for example.
Jifl
--
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts
2003-10-08 18:51 ` Jonathan Larmour
@ 2003-10-08 22:32 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2003-10-08 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:28:37PM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>
>>> Ping?
>>
>> I added ecos.sourceware.org to rcpthosts.
>
> It works fine, thanks! I guess getting the list headers to also say
> ecos.sourceware.org is more difficult, looking at the separate tree of
> ezmlm stuff required for gcc.gnu.org for example.
Actually I might be wrong here, it could in fact be quite easy... I think
it is just a case of setting something in the DIR/outhost (and probably
also inhost) file, according to the ezmlm docs it seems to be.
Obviously we'd need to still accept mail at the old address (apparently
this needs ezmlm-reject -T in DIR/editor according to
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/overseers/2000-q3/msg00007.html which should
hopefully already be done, but may need checking since some lists have
been created since then).
You can play with the ecos-maintainers list if unsure - that list is v.low
traffic and it's okay for one of us to resend something if needed.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-08 22:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-05 14:41 ecos.sourceware.org rcpthosts Jonathan Larmour
2003-08-05 15:14 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-10-08 12:28 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-10-08 14:50 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-10-08 18:51 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-10-08 22:32 ` Jonathan Larmour
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).