From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21663 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2004 16:23:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21656 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2004 16:23:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jifvik.dyndns.org) (81.104.194.28) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2004 16:23:47 -0000 Received: from eCosCentric.com (garibaldi.jifvik.org [172.31.1.2]) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7165137485 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:23:39 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3FF83E0A.9080604@eCosCentric.com> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 16:23:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#rbl-sucks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-q1/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 It says at http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#rbl-sucks that there have been no false positives, and so "undoubtedly" there's a problem with the mail server. With RBLs like spamcop, I don't think that's necessarily true. Also the bounce apparently says, e.g.: >Connected to 193.74.208.146 but sender was rejected. > Remote host said: 553 5.3.0 Spam Rejected - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml Could there also be a mention of http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html ? Ta, Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine