From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24333 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2005 15:26:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24321 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Aug 2005 15:26:11 -0000 Received: from cpc3-cmbg5-3-0-cust170.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (HELO jifvik.dyndns.org) (81.104.194.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:26:11 +0000 Received: from [172.31.1.2] (garibaldi.jifvik.org [172.31.1.2]) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF3D3FE41 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:25:59 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <43108604.3060002@jifvik.org> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:26:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050720) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: [Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080808080707080709090902" X-SW-Source: 2005-q3/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080808080707080709090902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-length: 602 Can anyone make sense of this bounce to ecos-discuss-owner? It was one of about a dozen. It seems to imply that something was sending mail back to sources.redhat.com (rightly or wrongly) and got rejected. But from what I can see badmailfrom on sourceware has only three addresses, two at netscape.net, one at indiatimes.com. I couldn't find the relevant logs either. The ones in /var/log/qmail didn't seem to have anything and /usr/src/qpsmtpd-dev/log/main (/usr/src???) had already expired entries this old. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine --------------080808080707080709090902 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" Content-length: 9026 Return-Path: Received: via dmail-2002(12) for +IMAPdir/Trash; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:32:12 +0100 (BST) Delivered-To: jlarmour@localhost.jifvik.org Received: by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 40009) id A8D5A3FE3E; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:32:08 +0100 (BST) Delivered-To: jifvikmail@localhost.jifvik.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38AE3FE3E for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:32:04 +0100 (BST) Envelope-to: jiflsw@jifvik.org Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:28:11 +0100 Received: from nenya.visn.co.uk [193.254.210.162] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.0) for jifvikmail@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:32:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from [12.107.209.250] (helo=sourceware.org) by nenya.visn.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8T0t-0007FV-3Y for jiflsw@jifvik.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:28:11 +0100 Received: (qmail 26490 invoked by alias); 26 Aug 2005 01:28:09 -0000 Delivered-To: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26483 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Aug 2005 01:28:08 -0000 Received: from wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com (HELO wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com) (203.101.73.137) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:28:08 +0000 Received: by wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com (Postfix) id 9316729C045; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:58:05 +0530 (IST) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:58:05 +0530 (IST) From: MAILER-DAEMON@wipro.com (Mail Delivery System) Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="8041829C0B4.1125019685/wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com" Message-Id: <20050826012805.9316729C045@wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com> X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on garibaldi.jifvik.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no version=3.0.4 This is a MIME-encapsulated message. --8041829C0B4.1125019685/wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com Content-Description: Notification Content-Type: text/plain Content-length: 564 This is the Postfix program at host wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The Postfix program : host sources.redhat.com[12.107.209.250] said: 550 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (in reply to RCPT TO command) --8041829C0B4.1125019685/wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com Content-Description: Delivery report Content-Type: message/delivery-status Content-length: 452 Reporting-MTA: dns; wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 8041829C0B4 X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Arrival-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:57:29 +0530 (IST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host sources.redhat.com[12.107.209.250] said: 550 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (in reply to RCPT TO command) --8041829C0B4.1125019685/wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com Content-Description: Undelivered Message Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-length: 5513 Received: from wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8041829C0B4; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:57:29 +0530 (IST) Received: from chn-snr-bh1.wipro.com (chn-snr-bh1.wipro.com [10.145.50.91]) by wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737DD29C045; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:57:29 +0530 (IST) Received: from mail pickup service by chn-snr-bh1.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:57:27 +0530 Received: from wip-cdctls-mx15.wipro.com ([203.101.73.133]) by chn-snr-bh2.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:12:59 +0530 Received: from wip-cdctls-mx4.wipro.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F492A8012 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:12:56 +0530 (IST) Received: from sourceware.org (sourceware.org [12.107.209.250]) by wip-cdctls-mx4.wipro.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 940563F4138 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:07:30 +0530 (IST) Received: (qmail 13944 invoked by alias); 25 Aug 2005 11:29:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Delivered-To: mailing list ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13781 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Aug 2005 11:28:47 -0000 Received: from sta-204-188-98-138.rockynet.com (HELO hermes.chez-thomas.org) (204.188.98.138) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:28:47 +0000 Received: by hermes.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 2000) id A112310002B; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:28:25 -0600 (MDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AE510002A; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:28:23 -0600 (MDT) From: Gary Thomas To: Steven_cheng <05071@alphanetworks.com> Cc: Andrew Lunn , eCos Discussion In-Reply-To: <001f01c5a925$da6b5b00$01473264@stevencheng> References: <006301c5a891$51aa0b70$01473264@stevencheng> <1124885384.28508.137.camel@hermes> <001f01c5a925$da6b5b00$01473264@stevencheng> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:28:22 -0600 Message-Id: <1124969303.28508.186.camel@hermes> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] who use the RAM block between 0x0 and 0xfcb8 ?? X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2005 11:42:59.0907 (UTC) FILETIME=[24CE8930:01C5A96A] Content-length: 2610 On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 11:34 +0800, Steven_cheng wrote: > Dear All, > > Thank you for your reply! But I have a question. > > Can I move the RedBoot workspace to other address, because I have > an application located at 0x0. I hope to empty the address 0x0 in the ROM / > ROMRAM modes > > How can I do for it ?? I don't know what platform/architecture you are using, but moving the data space (RedBoot's workspace) to another location, while possible, is probably a non-trivial job. What kind of application do you have/need at 0x0? > > Thank you~~ > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary Thomas" > To: "Steven_cheng" <05071@alphanetworks.com> > Cc: "eCos Discussion" > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 8:09 PM > Subject: Re: [ECOS] who use the RAM block between 0x0 and 0xfcb8 ?? > > > > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 17:50 +0800, Steven_cheng wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I have one question about the RAM memory usage, because I > > > found that the RAM address 0x0 -0xfcb8 is always used. > > > > > > The following list is presented in my environmenet: > > > > > > 1. ROM mode: > > > RAM: 0x00000000-0x10000000, [0x0000fcb8-0x0ffdd000] available > > > > > > > This is the workspace (variables, etc) for RedBoot > > > > > 2. ROMRAM mode: > > > RAM: 0x00000000-0x10000000, [0x00042678-0x0ffdd000] available > > > > > > > Workspace + RedBoot code (instructions) > > > > > 3: RAM mode: > > > RAM: 0x00000000-0x10000000, [0x0007ebf8-0x0ffdd000] available > > > > > > > Workspace + RedBoot code (instructions), this time loaded at a > > higher address which does not conflict with what is used in > > ROMRAM mode. > > > > > > > > Anybody can tell me who use the RAM block between 0x0 and 0xfcb8 ?? > > > > > > Thank you~~ > > > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > > MLB Associates | Embedded world > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > -- > > Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos > > and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss > > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss --8041829C0B4.1125019685/wip-cdctls-mx3.wipro.com-- --------------080808080707080709090902--