From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2466 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2005 11:49:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2458 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2005 11:49:44 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:49:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jA1BngdK017636 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 06:49:42 -0500 Received: from pobox.surrey.redhat.com (pobox.surrey.redhat.com [172.16.10.17]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jA1BnfV14668 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 06:49:41 -0500 Received: from [172.31.0.98] (vpn-68-12.surrey.redhat.com [10.32.68.12]) by pobox.surrey.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jA1Bncvl010327 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:49:38 GMT Message-ID: <4367568A.8060507@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:03:00 -0000 From: Nick Clifton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (X11/20051006) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Subversion and sources.redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00153.txt.bz2 Hi Guys, What are your feelings on switching the CVS repositories on sources.redhat.com over to subversion ? I see that GCC is switching over to it, so presumably there are good reasons for doing so. At the moment however I am only just beginning to learn how to use this tool, so I do not really know what is capable of or whether it really is worth replacing CVS with it. Cheers Nick