From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2202 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2006 01:48:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 2039 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2006 01:48:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cpc1-cmbg5-3-0-cust205.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (HELO jifvik.dyndns.org) (81.104.192.205) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 05 Mar 2006 01:48:23 +0000 Received: from [172.31.1.142] (neelix.jifvik.org [172.31.1.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845B93FFF; Sun, 5 Mar 2006 01:48:20 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <440A434B.5050208@jifvik.org> Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 01:48:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: E-mail address in GDB Gnats References: <8f2776cb0603031327r39342a02o8ae86c4830df2046@mail.gmail.com> <4409BE32.1090203@jifvik.org> <8f2776cb0603040839w339f3290r60ca6ff571ab5690@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0603040839w339f3290r60ca6ff571ab5690@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote: > On 3/4/06, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > >>I've changed the address for you in the "responsible" file, which is what >>maps the GNATS id "jimb" to an e-mail address. >> >>However I haven't touched anything else, including in particular all the >>bugs which were originated by you. While a global search and replace in >>/sourceware/gnats/gdb-db is possible, I'm not sure whether it's a good >>idea. If someone responsible wants to say it is ok, then I will do it. > > > Well, thanks very much for updating the "responsible file", at least, Jonathan. > > I think a global search and replace is okay. None of the bugs in the > public database were things Red Hat was waiting for, and I hope to > continue to contribute to GDB in my new job. Well it's true you're not exactly anybody :-), so I've gone and done it. History has now been revised ;). Just in case, I've kept a backup of the previous version in /tmp/gdb-db.tbz. tmpwatch will eat it after a while if it turns out not to be needed. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine