From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2794 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2006 13:45:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 2786 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Mar 2006 13:45:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.ecoscentric.com (HELO snape.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.199) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:44:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.7.9] (dargo.barn.ecoscentric.com [192.168.7.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by snape.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3242DC8088; Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:44:51 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <442154D3.3030402@jifvik.org> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:45:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: E-mail address in GDB Gnats References: <8f2776cb0603031327r39342a02o8ae86c4830df2046@mail.gmail.com> <4409BE32.1090203@jifvik.org> <8f2776cb0603040839w339f3290r60ca6ff571ab5690@mail.gmail.com> <440A434B.5050208@jifvik.org> <440C71A1.8070000@gnu.org> <8f2776cb0603061000v6e460148le0de98ca8f55c784@mail.gmail.com> <440C7DDD.2030109@jifvik.org> <8f2776cb0603061035w5ff3e93fp70697581db5a33ab@mail.gmail.com> <20060306191757.GE27290@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <8f2776cb0603211645p708de77el90ccc37e3cbf2123@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0603211645p708de77el90ccc37e3cbf2123@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote: > On 3/6/06, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>Actually, Jim, I'm not sure what Red Hat counsel or the steering >>committee has to do with anything. If we don't change your email >>address we'll either be spamming a noninterested third party or >>(eventually) generating guaranteed email bounces. I think it makes >>sense to change any problem email addresses in GNATS. >> >>I realize that we haven't done this for everyone who changes jobs but I >>think it makes sense to do so and I think it is to your credit that you >>even thought about this. >> >>Neither Red Hat nor the gdb steering committee exercise any formal >>control over the day-to-day operations of this site so unless it is the >>consensus of the site administrators that Jonathan's change was a bad >>idea, I think we should probably just take steps to change all of the >>jimb@redhat.com's to whatever Jim suggests. > > > It's been two weeks and there haven't been further comments on this > question. At this point, I believe sourceware will be getting bounces > for mail sent to jimb@redhat.com. I think the most constructive thing > would be to change those addresses to jimb@red-bean.com. I think the management of the GDB Gnats database is down to the GDB maintainers. If there's been no further comments, then I think you need to be talking to them. Although I imagine that changing it to jimb@sourceware.org (which points to red-bean.com) may seem a little less revisionist to them. FAOD new PRs in the relevant categories are (still) being assigned to jimb@red-bean.com. Jifl -- --["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine