From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4434.964480177@upchuck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000724190500.A7298@cygnus.com>
In message < 20000724190500.A7298@cygnus.com >you write:
> I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat
> .com.
> Here's the header I received:
>
> >Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
> >Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
> >Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
> >From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
> >To: cgf@redhat.com
> >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redha
> t.com
> >Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Length: 3242
>
> Notice the 'Reply-To:'. This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.c
> om:
>
> >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sourc
> es.redhat.com
>
> As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?
>
> Should we contact Red Hat about this?
Yes, it's probably rewriting it to implement host hiding.
jeff
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Cc: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4434.964480177@upchuck> (raw)
Message-ID: <20000724160900.W6tNQOD17oolD_FcOHWyPYBy6OCxnbTHFr0DQlQ9QaY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20000724190500.A7298@cygnus.com>
In message < 20000724190500.A7298@cygnus.com >you write:
> I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat
> .com.
> Here's the header I received:
>
> >Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
> >Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
> >Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
> >From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
> >To: cgf@redhat.com
> >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redha
> t.com
> >Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Length: 3242
>
> Notice the 'Reply-To:'. This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.c
> om:
>
> >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sourc
> es.redhat.com
>
> As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?
>
> Should we contact Red Hat about this?
Yes, it's probably rewriting it to implement host hiding.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-30 6:08 Chris Faylor
2000-07-24 16:05 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law [this message]
2000-07-24 16:09 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-07-24 19:14 ` Jim Kingdon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4434.964480177@upchuck \
--to=law@cygnus.com \
--cc=overseers@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).