* Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 Chris Faylor
2000-07-24 16:05 ` Chris Faylor
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat.com.
Here's the header I received:
>Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
>Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
>Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
>From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
>To: cgf@redhat.com
>Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redhat.com
>Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Length: 3242
Notice the 'Reply-To:'. This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.com:
>Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com
As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?
Should we contact Red Hat about this?
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?
2000-12-30 6:08 Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right? Chris Faylor
@ 2000-07-24 16:05 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chris Faylor @ 2000-07-24 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat.com.
Here's the header I received:
>Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
>Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
>Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
>From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
>To: cgf@redhat.com
>Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redhat.com
>Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Length: 3242
Notice the 'Reply-To:'. This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.com:
>Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com
As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?
Should we contact Red Hat about this?
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?
2000-12-30 6:08 Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right? Chris Faylor
2000-07-24 16:05 ` Chris Faylor
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-07-24 19:14 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
> Should we contact Red Hat about this?
Sounds like it to me (North Carolina sysadmin, specifically). As for
how to do that, well, the official channel is sysadmin@redhat.com.
Whether it gets you any kind of reasonable response is another
question, but it is always good practice to be able to say "I tried
submitting it through channels" before working other channels. In the
case of adding sources.redhat.com to the DNS, I sent email to
sysadmin@redhat.com about 2 or 3 times, a week or a few apart.
Then you call someone up. I picked Nate Golnik because I had sort of
heard of him second-hand. And he got it done a day or so later. If
you know someone, you might start there....
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2000-07-24 19:14 ` Jim Kingdon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jim Kingdon @ 2000-07-24 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
> Should we contact Red Hat about this?
Sounds like it to me (North Carolina sysadmin, specifically). As for
how to do that, well, the official channel is sysadmin@redhat.com.
Whether it gets you any kind of reasonable response is another
question, but it is always good practice to be able to say "I tried
submitting it through channels" before working other channels. In the
case of adding sources.redhat.com to the DNS, I sent email to
sysadmin@redhat.com about 2 or 3 times, a week or a few apart.
Then you call someone up. I picked Nate Golnik because I had sort of
heard of him second-hand. And he got it done a day or so later. If
you know someone, you might start there....
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?
2000-12-30 6:08 Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right? Chris Faylor
2000-07-24 16:05 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
@ 2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-07-24 16:09 ` Jeffrey A Law
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-12-30 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: overseers
In message < 20000724190500.A7298@cygnus.com >you write:
> I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat
> .com.
> Here's the header I received:
>
> >Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
> >Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
> >Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
> >From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
> >To: cgf@redhat.com
> >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redha
> t.com
> >Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Length: 3242
>
> Notice the 'Reply-To:'. This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.c
> om:
>
> >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sourc
> es.redhat.com
>
> As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?
>
> Should we contact Red Hat about this?
Yes, it's probably rewriting it to implement host hiding.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right?
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
@ 2000-07-24 16:09 ` Jeffrey A Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2000-07-24 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: overseers
In message < 20000724190500.A7298@cygnus.com >you write:
> I've just tried to subscribe to the sourcenav mailing list using cgf@redhat
> .com.
> Here's the header I received:
>
> >Mailing-List: contact sourcenav-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
> >Date: 24 Jul 2000 22:56:14 -0000
> >Message-ID: <964479374.22296.ezmlm@sources.redhat.com>
> >From: sourcenav-help@redhat.com
> >To: cgf@redhat.com
> >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479374.hfkehaaaedngmaoccdde-cgf=redhat.com@redha
> t.com
> >Subject: confirm subscribe to sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Length: 3242
>
> Notice the 'Reply-To:'. This is the Reply-To when I subscribe cgf@cygnus.c
> om:
>
> >Reply-To: sourcenav-sc.964479819.icepbglfboieelcdpnjc-cgf=cygnus.com@sourc
> es.redhat.com
>
> As a guess, I'd say that Red Hat's smtp is munging something?
>
> Should we contact Red Hat about this?
Yes, it's probably rewriting it to implement host hiding.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-30 6:08 Hmm. sources.redhat.com still not right? Chris Faylor
2000-07-24 16:05 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-07-24 19:14 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jeffrey A Law
2000-07-24 16:09 ` Jeffrey A Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).