From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18145 invoked by alias); 15 Aug 2006 03:41:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 18138 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Aug 2006 03:41:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sd-green-bigip-98.dreamhost.com (HELO spunkymail-a14.dreamhost.com) (208.97.132.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:41:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.107] (c-69-251-191-120.hsd1.md.comcast.net [69.251.191.120]) by spunkymail-a14.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2880190E2A for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <44E1425F.1000709@dberlin.org> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:37:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060317 SUSE/1.5-27 Thunderbird/1.5 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Update subversion? References: <20060815032720.GA7069@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20060815032720.GA7069@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-q3/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 Christopher Faylor wrote: > up2date is claiming that there is a new version of subversion available. > > Is it ok to update this Dan? Don't. We're using the official rpm specs to build rpms of subversion. We also have a few performance patches that are part of a later version (1.4.0) in our 1.3.x build that we'd lose. Subversion is going to release a new version (1.4.0) in a few weeks anyway. The update is probably to 1.3.x, which is a bugfix release of the 1.3.x series, and doesn't contain anything we really care about :) > > cgf >