From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25048 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2008 15:17:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 25037 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2008 15:17:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:17:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1FFDK1a031705; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:13:20 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m1FFDKKS012218; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:13:20 -0500 Received: from x61.akkadia.org (vpn-248-147.boston.redhat.com [10.13.248.147]) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.6) with ESMTP id m1FFDJXZ008890; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:13:19 -0500 Message-ID: <47B5AB55.8080707@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:25:00 -0000 From: Ulrich Drepper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Pinski , Roland McGrath , overseers@sourceware.org, rsa@us.ibm.com, "Carlos O'Donell" Subject: Re: Create a libc-help mailing list for the GNU Libc project. References: <47B4A30F.9070905@codesourcery.com> <20080214213508.GA7537@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080214234543.7A973270195@magilla.localdomain> <20080214235447.GA8051@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <1203051740.16053.7.camel@localhost> <20080215150013.GB11268@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> In-Reply-To: <20080215150013.GB11268@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Faylor wrote: > Are you referring to libc-hacker, Andrew? If so, that sounds like a good > question to me. Maybe libc-alpha should just be retired? No. libc-hacker is for the people doing the actual work. libc-alpha is for feedback on the current development code by other people. - -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHtatU2ijCOnn/RHQRAj5jAKDKcfkM3UuopTNS98au9q9o5kFavwCgkZ7H hguF1Xb+G3dUgEt6CD1yn58= =YLp1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----