* Fwd: lost mail to gcc.gnu.org / sourceware.org
@ 2008-12-17 5:28 Joern Rennecke
2008-12-17 6:09 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joern Rennecke @ 2008-12-17 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers; +Cc: joern.rennecke
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]
I'm forwarding a copy from my spamcop.net account in case there is a
specific problem in mail delivery between arc.com / sourceware.org .
----- Forwarded message from joernr@arc.com -----
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:07:46 +0000
From: Joern Rennecke <joernr@arc.com>
Reply-To: Joern Rennecke <joernr@arc.com>
Subject: lost mail to gcc.gnu.org / sourceware.org
To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Cc: amylaar@spamcop.net
I've sent an email yesterday to newlib@sourceware.org, but it never got on
the list. I've sent today another mail repeating the message as best I could
remember, this time keeping a Bcc to myself; also, I've sent an email to
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org.
Neither of them appear to have made it to the list, while I see other, more
recent posts appear in the web archives.
Could you find out what happened to these emails?
----- End forwarded message -----
[-- Attachment #2: lostmail --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3214 bytes --]
From joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com Wed Dec 17 04:17:14 2008
Received: from sjvm-exch02.arc.com ([172.16.2.25]) by savm-exch03.arc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:14 +0000
Received: from elsdt-razorfish.arc.com ([172.17.8.221]) by sjvm-exch02.arc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:17:09 -0800
Received: from elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBH4HBcP029008;
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:11 GMT
Received: (from joernr@localhost)
by elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBH4HBVF029007;
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:11 GMT
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:11 +0000
From: Joern Rennecke <joernr@arc.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, avr@gjlay.de
Subject: Re: [patch,avr]: Better support for single bit operations
Message-ID: <20081217041711.GB25958@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Return-Path: joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Dec 2008 04:17:09.0876 (UTC) FILETIME=[54613B40:01C95FFE]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-5.500.1027-16342.004
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.322800-0.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Content-Length: 300
Lines: 5
I have some combiner patches to better honour rtx_costs when canonicalizing
and splitting instructions; this helps the ARC compiler generate / preserve
bits tests, particularily when there are known zero bits.
I'm only waiting for acknowledgement of our copyright assignment by the FSF
to post them.
From joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com Wed Dec 17 04:34:32 2008
Received: from sjvm-exch02.arc.com ([172.16.2.25]) by savm-exch03.arc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:34:32 +0000
Received: from elsdt-razorfish.arc.com ([172.17.8.221]) by sjvm-exch02.arc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:34:26 -0800
Received: from elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBH4YS8r029239;
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:34:28 GMT
Received: (from joernr@localhost)
by elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBH4YSa0029238;
Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:34:28 GMT
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:34:28 +0000
From: Joern Rennecke <joernr@arc.com>
To: newlib@sourceware.org
Subject: use longlong.h?
Message-ID: <20081217043428.GC25958@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Return-Path: joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Dec 2008 04:34:27.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEA9DF00:01C96000]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-5.500.1027-16342.004
X-TM-AS-Result: No-0.624900-0.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Content-Length: 185
Lines: 3
I've noticed that we could make the code that uses Storeinc / Pack_32
a lot more efficient if we used the operations defined in longlong.h .
Would it be OK to use longlong.h in newlib?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: lost mail to gcc.gnu.org / sourceware.org
2008-12-17 5:28 Fwd: lost mail to gcc.gnu.org / sourceware.org Joern Rennecke
@ 2008-12-17 6:09 ` Jonathan Larmour
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Larmour @ 2008-12-17 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joern Rennecke; +Cc: Sourceware Overseers, joern.rennecke
Joern Rennecke wrote:
> I'm forwarding a copy from my spamcop.net account in case there is a
> specific problem in mail delivery between arc.com / sourceware.org .
They have all been considered as spam:
Dec 4 15:37:26 sourceware spam: -!*blocked:
joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com 83.244.211.66 -> gcc@gcc.gnu.org (SA:
score=7.8 required=5.0
tests=PRESCANNED,BAYES_20,BOTNET,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP)
Dec 14 04:44:48 sourceware spam: blocked: joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com
83.244.211.66 -> newlib@sources.redhat.com (SA: score=6.9 required=5.0
tests=PRESCANNED,AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP)
Dec 17 04:17:58 sourceware spam: -!*blocked:
joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com 83.244.211.66 -> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
(SA: score=7.4 required=5.0
tests=PRESCANNED,AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,FAKE_REPLY_C,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP)
Dec 17 04:35:08 sourceware spam: blocked: joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com
83.244.211.66 -> newlib@sourceware.org (SA: score=6.6 required=5.0
tests=PRESCANNED,AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP)
Dec 17 05:09:09 sourceware spam: blocked: joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com
83.244.211.66 -> overseers@sources.redhat.com (SA: score=6.4 required=5.0
tests=PRESCANNED,AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP)
I suspect you are doing direct mail delivery from your own computer,
rather than via the arc.com servers. In particular there is no reverse DNS
entry for your IP. As a result you look a lot like the sort of zombie PC
in a botnet that is very commonly used for sending spam these days.
The easiest thing is for you to direct your mail to go via arc.com
Jifl
> ----- Forwarded message from joernr@arc.com -----
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:07:46 +0000
> From: Joern Rennecke <joernr@arc.com>
> Reply-To: Joern Rennecke <joernr@arc.com>
> Subject: lost mail to gcc.gnu.org / sourceware.org
> To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
> Cc: amylaar@spamcop.net
>
> I've sent an email yesterday to newlib@sourceware.org, but it never got on
> the list. I've sent today another mail repeating the message as best I
> could
> remember, this time keeping a Bcc to myself; also, I've sent an email to
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org.
> Neither of them appear to have made it to the list, while I see other, more
> recent posts appear in the web archives.
> Could you find out what happened to these emails?
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com Wed Dec 17 04:17:14 2008
> Received: from sjvm-exch02.arc.com ([172.16.2.25]) by savm-exch03.arc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
> Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:14 +0000
> Received: from elsdt-razorfish.arc.com ([172.17.8.221]) by sjvm-exch02.arc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
> Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:17:09 -0800
> Received: from elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBH4HBcP029008;
> Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:11 GMT
> Received: (from joernr@localhost)
> by elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBH4HBVF029007;
> Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:11 GMT
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:17:11 +0000
> From: Joern Rennecke <joernr@arc.com>
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, avr@gjlay.de
> Subject: Re: [patch,avr]: Better support for single bit operations
> Message-ID: <20081217041711.GB25958@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
> Return-Path: joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Dec 2008 04:17:09.0876 (UTC) FILETIME=[54613B40:01C95FFE]
> X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-5.500.1027-16342.004
> X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.322800-0.000000-31
> X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes
> X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
> Content-Length: 300
> Lines: 5
>
> I have some combiner patches to better honour rtx_costs when canonicalizing
> and splitting instructions; this helps the ARC compiler generate / preserve
> bits tests, particularily when there are known zero bits.
> I'm only waiting for acknowledgement of our copyright assignment by the FSF
> to post them.
>
> From joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com Wed Dec 17 04:34:32 2008
> Received: from sjvm-exch02.arc.com ([172.16.2.25]) by savm-exch03.arc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
> Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:34:32 +0000
> Received: from elsdt-razorfish.arc.com ([172.17.8.221]) by sjvm-exch02.arc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
> Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:34:26 -0800
> Received: from elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
> by elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBH4YS8r029239;
> Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:34:28 GMT
> Received: (from joernr@localhost)
> by elsdt-razorfish.arc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBH4YSa0029238;
> Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:34:28 GMT
> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:34:28 +0000
> From: Joern Rennecke <joernr@arc.com>
> To: newlib@sourceware.org
> Subject: use longlong.h?
> Message-ID: <20081217043428.GC25958@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
> Return-Path: joernr@elsdt-razorfish.arc.com
> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Dec 2008 04:34:27.0184 (UTC) FILETIME=[BEA9DF00:01C96000]
> X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-5.500.1027-16342.004
> X-TM-AS-Result: No-0.624900-0.000000-31
> X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes
> X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
> Content-Length: 185
> Lines: 3
>
> I've noticed that we could make the code that uses Storeinc / Pack_32
> a lot more efficient if we used the operations defined in longlong.h .
> Would it be OK to use longlong.h in newlib?
>
--
------["The best things in life aren't things."]------ Opinions==mine
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-17 6:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-17 5:28 Fwd: lost mail to gcc.gnu.org / sourceware.org Joern Rennecke
2008-12-17 6:09 ` Jonathan Larmour
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).