From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24190 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2009 22:37:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 24181 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Nov 2009 22:37:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:37:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA5MbEMj031543; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:37:15 -0500 Received: from jpickard-laptop.phx (vpn-242-158.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.242.158]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA5MbEwK020859; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:37:14 -0500 Message-ID: <4AF3539A.3010501@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:37:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Pickard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091014 Fedora/3.0-2.8.b4.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Galgoci CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Eric Brown , overseers@sourceware.org, ian@airs.com Subject: Re: Required host migration (Sourceware) References: <4AC25F6E.6050208@redhat.com> <20091001180237.GD20893@redhat.com> <4AC4F8D6.7070200@redhat.com> <20091001191144.GA22850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20091001192043.GA32049@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 On 10/01/2009 02:10 PM, Matthew Galgoci wrote: >> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:20:43 -0400 >> From: Frank Ch. Eigler >> To: Eric Brown , overseers@sourceware.org, >> Jonathan Pickard , >> Matthew Galgoci , ian@airs.com >> Subject: Re: Required host migration (Sourceware) >> >> Hi - >> >> cgf wrote: >> >>> mgalgoci wrote: >>>> I would rather see us expend our effort on the new setup and suggest we take >>>> one of the lighter used servers and migrate it before the other two and setup >>>> some preliminary services on it. Make sense? >> >> Unfortunately sourceware is not set up to be easily segmented into >> partial services. server2 and server3 are too small to even store all >> the data. > > Be that as it may, we can at least stand up so that folks can test > connectivity as mentioned earlier. On that server a "sorry" page could > be setup indicating that sourceware is in the process of being moved. > All, We have identified the weekend of December 12 as the migration period for these servers. Based on the original e-mail and responses, I believe the choice is between two options: 1) move to PHX2 (migrate) 2) order new hardware for PHX2 (phased migration) For 1) - Red Hat IT will move the machines and bring them back up in PHX2, reconfiguring their network details if wanted and providing remote access (serial and/or KVM along with remote power management). For 2) - Red Hat IT will install any new hardware and provide remote access (serial and/or KVM along with remote power management) and you will migrate your services from PHX to PHX2. Please advise on how you would like to proceed. Thanks, Jonathan