From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1553 invoked by alias); 31 May 2012 18:16:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 1546 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2012 18:16:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 May 2012 18:16:10 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Sa9ur-00064t-2V from Carlos_ODonell@mentor.com ; Thu, 31 May 2012 11:16:09 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 31 May 2012 11:16:08 -0700 Received: from [172.30.0.152] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Thu, 31 May 2012 11:16:08 -0700 Message-ID: <4FC7B567.2090605@mentor.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:22:00 -0000 From: Carlos O'Donell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" CC: Subject: Re: Banned IP address for CI glibc builds? References: <4FC7AA18.8030307@mentor.com> <20120531173558.GG26201@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120531173558.GG26201@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 On 5/31/2012 1:35 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:27:52PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> One of our volunteers is bringing up a continuous integration system >> for building and testing GLIBC. >> >> The IP address of the machine is: 130.161.158.181 > > OK, it's been unblocked. Please ensure that these folks use efficient > git operations (pull as opposed to clone). Many thanks. The volunteer says he uses `git pull --rebase` to update the repo which seems like the most efficient operation. Cheers, Carlos. -- Carlos O'Donell Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery carlos_odonell@mentor.com carlos@codesourcery.com +1 (613) 963 1026